World Journal of Nephrology and Urology, ISSN 1927-1239 print, 1927-1247 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Nephrol Urol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjnu.org

Original Article

Volume 1, Number 2-3, June 2012, pages 66-72


Association of Hyperuricemia With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Albuminuria, Diabetes, Hypertension in Chronic Renal Failure

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Carotid artery intima media thickness at right common carotid artery (RT CCA) and right carotid bifurcation (RT BULB) in a hyperuricemic CRF patient.

Tables

Table 1. Demographic Characters and Clinical Data of CRF Patients and Healthy Controls
 
CRF PatientsHealthy controls
Abbreviations: GFR, Glomerular filtration rate; CAIMT, Carotid artery intima medial thickness; CRF, Chronic renal failure.
Number13266
Male: Female85 (64.4%):47 (35.6%)39 (59.1%):27(40.9%)
Age (years)45.96 ± 0.9246.74 ± 1.19
Fasting blood sugar (mg %)111.01 ± 3.1485.87 ± 1.25
GFR ( mL/min/1.73 m2)17.47 ± 0.52116.74 ± 3.51
24 hours total urine albumin excretion (mg)784.43 ± 45.23Not measurable
Smoker: Non-smoker59 (44.7%):73 (55.3%)00:66
Dyslipidemic: Non-Dyslipidemic36 (27.3%):96(72.7)00:66
Hypertensive: Non-hypertensive80 (60.6%):53(39.4%)00:66
Diabetic: Non-diabetic37 (28%):95(72%)00:66
Hyperuricemia35 (26.5%)00
CAIMT (Micron)908.91 ± 14.47707.16 ± 6.79 micron

 

Table 2. Demographic Characters and Clinical Data of Hyperuricemic and Non-Hyperuricemic CRF Patients
 
Hyperuricemic CRF PatientsNon-hyperuricemic CRF Patients
Abbreviations: GFR, Glomerular filtration rate; CAIMT, Carotid artery intima medial thickness; CRF, Chronic renal failure.
Number3597
Male: Female80%:20%58.76%:41.23%
Age (years)45.46 ± 1.0647.34 ± 1.84
Fasting blood sugar (mg %)134.88 ± 7.42102.40 ± 2.89
GFR ( mL/min/1.73 m2)17.02 ± 1.0017.64 ± 0.60
24 hours total urine albumin excretion (mg)1148.71 ± 81.19652.99 ± 47.73
Smoker: Non-smoker24 (68.6%):11 (31.4%)16 (16.5%):81 (83.5%)
Dyslipidemic: Non-Dyslipidemic20 (57.1%):15 (42.9%)16 (16.5%):81 (83.5%)
Hypertensive: Non-hypertensive30 (86.5%):5 (14.3%)50 (51.5%):47 (48.5%)
Diabetic: Non-diabetic16 (45.7%):19 (44.3%)23 (23.7%):74 (76.3%)
CAIMT (Micron)1051.22 ± 15.60857.56 ± 15.95

 

Table 3. Comparison of CAIMT of Different Groups by Independent Samples t Test
 
Different groups of CRF patientsCAIMT value (Micron)P value
Abbreviations: CRF, Chronic renal failure; CAIMT; Carotid artery intima media thickness. P value < 0.05, statistically significant. P value ≥ 0.05, statistically not significant.
Hyperuricemic CRF pt: Non-hyperuricemic pt1051.22 ± 15.60:857.56 ± 15.950.000
Hyperuricemic CRF pt: Healthy Controls1051.22 ± 15.60:707.16 ± 6.790.000

 

Table 4. Linear Multivariate Regression Analysis of Traditional Risk Factors Correlating With CAIMT in CRF Patients.
 
Coefficientsa
Independent VariablestP value95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Lower BoundUpper Bound
a. Dependent Variable: CAIMT
Age2.0320.0440.0352.690
Sex2.7690.00712.16073.148
Smoking2.9480.00416.45583.721
Dyslipidemia3.3670.00125.957100.021
Hypertension3.2070.00220.08084.890
Dialysis2.9570.00418.12691.566
Glomerular Filtration Rate-5.6990.000-9.769-4.732
Protein3.2430.0020.0210.086
Fasting Blood Sugar3.6420.0000.4051.369
Hyperuricemia2.4010.0187.80881.195