World Journal of Nephrology and Urology, ISSN 1927-1239 print, 1927-1247 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Nephrol Urol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjnu.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 2, June 2018, pages 45-52


Microbiology Risk Factors and Outcomes of Peritonitis in Tunisian Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Impact of peritonitis on residual renal function.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Impact of peritonitis on technique survival.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Impact of peritonitis on patient survival.

Tables

Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients
 
Patients (n)182
Sex (male/female)109:73
Age (years, mean ± standard deviation)43.93 ± 16.95
Mean duration of follow-up (months)27 .75 ± 26.18
Underlying disease, n (%)
  Chronic glomerulonephritis25 (13.73)
  Diabetes mellitus64 (35.16)
  Hypertension16 (8.79)
  Interstitial nephropathy41 (22.52)
  Others or unknown36 (19.8)

 

Table 2. Distribution of Patients According to the Number of Peritonitis
 
Number of peritonitisNumber of patients
146
221
314
45
53
62
91

 

Table 3. Details of Causative Organisms of the First Peritonitis From 2006 to 2016
 
Group of microorganismn (%)
Gram-positive cocci26 (27.92)
  Staphylococcus aureus16 (17.20)
  Staphylococcus epidermidis3 (3.22)
  Streptococcus7 (7.5)
Gram-negative rods22 (23.9)
  Pseudomonas6 (6.45)
  Acinetobacter2 (2.15)
  Enterobacter3 (3.22)
  Klebsiella pneumoniae5 (5.37)
  Escherichia coli6 (6.45)
Candida albicans5 (5.37)
Aspergillus1 (1.07)
Others4 (4.3)
Culture-negative34 (36.55)

 

Table 4. Causes of Peritonitis
 
NumberPercentage
Lack of asepsis14078.2
Extender crack21.1
Endogenous cause21.1
Other infectious source42.2
Exit-site infection147.8
Catheter disconnection31.6
Catheter breaking10.5
Catheter crack21.1
Defective material42.2
Unknown cause73.9

 

Table 5. Comparison Between Peritonitis-Free and Peritonitis Group
 
Peritonitis-free (n = 89), %Peritonitis** (n = 93), %P value
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, or number (%). GFR: glomerular filtration rate (estimated by the average of renal BUN and creatinine clearance). *Defined as the presence of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease or peripheral artery disease. **At least one peritonitis. CRP: C-reactive protein.
Sex (men)50560.67
Age (years)43 ± 1544 ± 180.62
Anuria11 (12.3)12 (12.9)0.52
Ultrafiltration (mL)1,715 ± 7321,632 ± 5940.67
Diabetes mellitus26350.08
Hypertension36520.08
Cardiovascular disease*8150.33
Serum albumin (g/dL)28.6 ± 5.2328.88 ± 5.40.87
Blood hemoglobin (g/dL)8.54 ± 1.318.57 ± 1.540.94
Serum calcium (mg/dL)2.15 ± 0.242.12 ± 0.260.67
Serum phosphorous (mg/dL)1.8 ± 0.641.73 ± 0.560.52
Serum cholesterol (mg/dL)3.51 ± 2.353.01 ± 1.510.41
CRP8.18 ± 1510.36 ± 170.6
Ferritin (µg/L)29.61 ± 253351 ± 4600.53
NPCR (g/kg/day)0.91 ± 0.431 ± 0.290.27
Baseline PD adequacy
  Total KT/V urea2.63 ± 0.882.69 ± 0.950.75
  Residual GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)2.19 ± 2.063.54 ± 3.60.16
  Total creatinine clearance (L/week)77.27 ± 31.5983.88 ± 28.510.33

 

Table 6. Cox Regression Model for Peritonitis Risk Factors
 
Multivariate analysis
HR95 % CIP
Residual GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)1.170.97 - 1.420.085
Diabetes mellitus0.770.27 - 2.150.61
Hypertension1.370.55 - 3.430.49

 

Table 7. Summary of Published Microbiology Studies
 
N: number of episodes. CoNS: coagulase-negative staph.
CountryScotlandUSACanadaKoreaTokyoTorontoAustralia
SourceRegistryMulticenter databaseMulticenter databaseSingle center13 centersSingle centerRegional
Episodes (N)9281,1422,8861,108-485145
Period of observation1999 - 20021998 - 20041998 - 20041992 - 20012005 - 20071995 - 20002000 - 2001
Gram-positive-62%61%44.9%42.7%53.6%46.9%
CoNS29.5%18.0716.3625.2%12%25.15%24.13%
S. aureus19.2%31.0542.4813.6%2614.4%6.9%
Gram-negative15.7%20.523.614.7%18.6%20.4%24.13%
Fungi15.2%3.923.662.16%3.3%6.8%4.8%
Culture-negative3.6%15.918.536.9%31.8%10.9%16%
AuthorKavanagh et al [1]Mujais [14]Mujais [14]Kim et al [15]Masashi et al [12]Krishnan et al [16]Kan et al [17]